The EU Referendum

imageNational Referendums are intended to trigger debate and discussion. However the manner in which the current EU Referendum has been held is utterly shameful.
It began innocently enough with both sides making claims which were immediately dismissed by their opponents. A pattern emerged of claim and counterclaim, with neither side really having the evidence to support their viewpoint and both options seeming to be a step into the unknown. As a result statistics began being trotted out to support their spurious claims.

One of the major statistics that the leave campaign has jumped upon is that the UK contributes £18.8billion to the EU, or £361million a day “enough for a new NHS hospital every day”. This implies that by not paying in this money the UK could build a new NHS hospital everyday, something I’m sure we would all be happy with. Firstly, that wouldn’t happen. That additional money has not been guaranteed for the NHS but it COULD be spent on it. Secondly, the statistic is wrong. The UK receives a rebate, negotiated by Margret Thatcher, and when you consider the project funding and farming subsidies it in turn receives the net contribution in 2014 was only £8.4billion, NOT £18.8billion.

Another major debating topic and source of scaremongering has been the subject of immigration. A leaflet for the Leave campaign this week claimed that Turkey and Macedonia were lining up to join the EU. A handy map was also included to highlight how close they are to Syria and Iraq, countries devastated by conflicts the UK has contributed towards, implying that we will soon be swamped by EU citizens desperate for our resources. Of course, migration has to be controlled and the UK Government’s target of net migration being reduced to 100,000 has been missed. But scaremongering tactics of this nature can lead to some very dangerous attitudes and reactions.
Theoretically a leave vote, revoking the free movement of EU workers, could result in a huge loss of those employed in the UK, such as vital nursing staff, and in return pensioners enjoying retirement in Benidorm could have to return to the UK instead; hardly a fair exchange. The Leave campaign state that international law would prevent expats from being forced to return home, the Remain side say there is no guarantee; back to the claim and counterclaims.

Workers rights generally will also come under threat. The EU sets minimum standards for working and employment conditions, such as the Working Time Directive which imposes limits on average hours worked, rest periods and paid annual leave. These basic rights for employees are of course a burden on big business who, if free from these requirements, could get away with treating their employees however they saw fit and most importantly of all, saving money and improving profit margins.

imageNigel Farage, a particularly vocal individual in the referendum debate, tweeted his despair in 2010 that the European Parliament voted for an increase to maternity pay. This is an indication of the potential attitudes that workers may be faced with if their rights are no longer protected, where sickness is a costly inconvenience and shareholders profits come first. Even more terrifyingly the UK could opt out of the European Convention of Human Rights with a Leave vote, and who knows where that might lead.

Is the EU perfect? No of course it isn’t. Immigration, the economy, law making and security are all important issues that need addressing but these are ongoing processes and cannot be simply solved with a single national referendum vote. It should also not be made as a reaction to your dislike of PM David Cameron or preference for Boris Johnson. The result of this referendum vote will resound with the UK long after those individuals have left politics.

But whatever your reasons for voting Leave or Remain, I would encourage you to fully investigate the facts before making your conclusions. For instance, The Sun newspaper backed a Brexit this week and in keeping with their history of publishing questionable facts, just as Liverpool FC supporters, declared a boost to shares on their front page. However the reality is that during the recent weeks of campaigning for the referendum the FTSE 100 has developed an undeniable downward trajectory caused by the debate and unknown outcome. Which just goes to prove the need to fully explore the facts behind the headlines and bold statements.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s